2000 Bristol Blenheim vs. 1962 Dodge Polara
To start off, 2000 Bristol Blenheim is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Dodge Polara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Dodge Polara would be higher. At 5,905 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Dodge Polara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Bristol Blenheim (350 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1962 Dodge Polara. (301 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Bristol Blenheim should accelerate faster than 1962 Dodge Polara. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Bristol Blenheim weights approximately 215 kg more than 1962 Dodge Polara. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Bristol Blenheim | 1962 Dodge Polara | |
Make | Bristol | Dodge |
Model | Blenheim | Polara |
Year Released | 2000 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5898 cc | 5905 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 301 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1740 kg | 1525 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 5140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2960 mm |