2000 Bristol Blenheim vs. 1962 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2000 Bristol Blenheim is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Bristol Blenheim is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Bristol Blenheim (350 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 290 more horse power than 1962 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Bristol Blenheim should accelerate faster than 1962 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Bristol Blenheim weights approximately 810 kg more than 1962 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Bristol Blenheim (500 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 385 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2000 Bristol Blenheim will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Bristol Blenheim | 1962 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Bristol | Nissan |
Model | Blenheim | Cedric |
Year Released | 2000 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5898 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 500 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1740 kg | 930 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2540 mm |