2000 Bristol Blenheim vs. 1968 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2000 Bristol Blenheim is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 7,010 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Bristol Blenheim (350 HP) has 15 more horse power than 1968 Ford Mustang. (335 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Bristol Blenheim should accelerate faster than 1968 Ford Mustang.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Ford Mustang (597 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 97 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Bristol Blenheim. (500 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1968 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Bristol Blenheim.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Bristol Blenheim | 1968 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Bristol | Ford |
Model | Blenheim | Mustang |
Year Released | 2000 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5898 cc | 7010 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 335 HP |
Torque | 500 Nm | 597 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2750 mm |