2000 Bristol Blenheim vs. 1997 Acura TL
To start off, 2000 Bristol Blenheim is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Acura TL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Acura TL would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Bristol Blenheim is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Bristol Blenheim (350 HP) has 150 more horse power than 1997 Acura TL. (200 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Bristol Blenheim should accelerate faster than 1997 Acura TL.
Because 2000 Bristol Blenheim is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Bristol Blenheim. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Acura TL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Bristol Blenheim | 1997 Acura TL | |
Make | Bristol | Acura |
Model | Blenheim | TL |
Year Released | 2000 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5898 cc | 3200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 200 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4864 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1786 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1405 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2840 mm |