2000 Bristol Blenheim vs. 1998 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 2000 Bristol Blenheim is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Bristol Blenheim is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Bristol Blenheim (350 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1998 Cadillac DeVille. (271 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Bristol Blenheim should accelerate faster than 1998 Cadillac DeVille. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Bristol Blenheim weights approximately 35 kg more than 1998 Cadillac DeVille. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Bristol Blenheim is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Bristol Blenheim. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Bristol Blenheim | 1998 Cadillac DeVille | |
| Make | Bristol | Cadillac |
| Model | Blenheim | DeVille |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5898 cc | 4598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 271 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1740 kg | 1705 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 5330 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1950 mm |
