2000 Bristol Blenheim vs. 2001 MG X20
To start off, 2001 MG X20 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Bristol Blenheim. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Bristol Blenheim would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Bristol Blenheim is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Bristol Blenheim (350 HP) has 173 more horse power than 2001 MG X20. (177 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Bristol Blenheim should accelerate faster than 2001 MG X20.
Because 2000 Bristol Blenheim is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Bristol Blenheim. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 MG X20, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Bristol Blenheim | 2001 MG X20 | |
Make | Bristol | MG |
Model | Blenheim | X20 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5898 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 177 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |