2000 Bristol Blenheim vs. 2006 Mazda 5
To start off, 2006 Mazda 5 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Bristol Blenheim. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Bristol Blenheim would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Bristol Blenheim is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Bristol Blenheim (350 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 193 more horse power than 2006 Mazda 5. (157 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Bristol Blenheim should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda 5.
Because 2000 Bristol Blenheim is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Bristol Blenheim. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Bristol Blenheim (500 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 299 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda 5. (201 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2000 Bristol Blenheim will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda 5.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Bristol Blenheim | 2006 Mazda 5 | |
Make | Bristol | Mazda |
Model | Blenheim | 5 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5898 cc | 2262 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 157 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 500 Nm | 201 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 6 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2760 mm |