2000 Bristol Blenheim vs. 2012 Peugeot RCZ
To start off, 2012 Peugeot RCZ is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Bristol Blenheim. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Bristol Blenheim would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Bristol Blenheim is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Bristol Blenheim (350 HP) has 153 more horse power than 2012 Peugeot RCZ. (197 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Bristol Blenheim should accelerate faster than 2012 Peugeot RCZ.
Because 2000 Bristol Blenheim is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Bristol Blenheim. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Peugeot RCZ, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Bristol Blenheim has automatic transmission and 2012 Peugeot RCZ has manual transmission. 2012 Peugeot RCZ will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Bristol Blenheim will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Bristol Blenheim | 2012 Peugeot RCZ | |
Make | Bristol | Peugeot |
Model | Blenheim | RCZ |
Year Released | 2000 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5898 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 197 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4287 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1845 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1359 mm |