2000 Bugatti EB 18-4 Veyron vs. 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Bugatti EB 18-4 Veyron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Bugatti EB 18-4 Veyron would be higher. At 6,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2000 Bugatti EB 18-4 Veyron is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Bugatti EB 18-4 Veyron will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak (820 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 170 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Bugatti EB 18-4 Veyron. (650 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Bugatti EB 18-4 Veyron. 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak has automatic transmission and 2000 Bugatti EB 18-4 Veyron has manual transmission. 2000 Bugatti EB 18-4 Veyron will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Bugatti EB 18-4 Veyron | 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak | |
| Make | Bugatti | Chevrolet |
| Model | EB 18-4 Veyron | Kodiak |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 6255 cc | 6600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 18 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | W | V |
| Horse Power | 555 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 650 Nm | 820 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 1600 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
