2000 Bugatti EB 218 vs. 2012 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2012 Jaguar XF is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Bugatti EB 218. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Bugatti EB 218 would be higher. At 6,253 cc (18 cylinders), 2000 Bugatti EB 218 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Bugatti EB 218 (544 HP) has 273 more horse power than 2012 Jaguar XF. (271 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Bugatti EB 218 should accelerate faster than 2012 Jaguar XF.
Because 2000 Bugatti EB 218 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Jaguar XF. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Bugatti EB 218 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Bugatti EB 218 (650 Nm) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Jaguar XF. (600 Nm). This means 2000 Bugatti EB 218 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Jaguar XF.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Bugatti EB 218 | 2012 Jaguar XF | |
| Make | Bugatti | Jaguar |
| Model | EB 218 | XF |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6253 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 18 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | W | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 544 HP | 271 HP |
| Torque | 650 Nm | 600 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5360 mm | 4961 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1877 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1461 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3340 mm | 2908 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 70 L |
