2000 Buick Cielo vs. 1946 Buick 40
To start off, 2000 Buick Cielo is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1946 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Buick Cielo (251 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 143 more horse power than 1946 Buick 40. (108 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Buick Cielo should accelerate faster than 1946 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Buick Cielo weights approximately 115 kg more than 1946 Buick 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1946 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1946 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Buick Cielo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Buick Cielo | 1946 Buick 40 | |
| Make | Buick | Buick |
| Model | Cielo | 40 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1946 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3800 cc | 4066 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 251 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1760 kg | 1645 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 3000 mm |
