2000 Buick Cielo vs. 1953 Talbot Baby
To start off, 2000 Buick Cielo is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Talbot Baby. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Talbot Baby would be higher. At 3,800 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Buick Cielo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Buick Cielo (251 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 143 more horse power than 1953 Talbot Baby. (108 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Buick Cielo should accelerate faster than 1953 Talbot Baby. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Buick Cielo weights approximately 104 kg more than 1953 Talbot Baby. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1953 Talbot Baby is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Talbot Baby. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Buick Cielo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Buick Cielo | 1953 Talbot Baby | |
| Make | Buick | Talbot |
| Model | Cielo | Baby |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1953 |
| Engine Size | 3800 cc | 2690 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 251 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1760 kg | 1656 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 3130 mm |
