2000 Buick Cielo vs. 1961 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2000 Buick Cielo is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,389 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Buick Cielo (251 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1961 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Buick Cielo should accelerate faster than 1961 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 380 kg more than 2000 Buick Cielo.
Because 1961 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Buick Cielo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Buick Cielo | 1961 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Buick | Cadillac |
| Model | Cielo | 62 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1961 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3800 cc | 6389 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 251 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1760 kg | 2140 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 3300 mm |
