2000 Buick Cielo vs. 1962 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 2000 Buick Cielo is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 6,964 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Ford Thunderbird (345 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 2000 Buick Cielo. (251 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 2000 Buick Cielo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 115 kg more than 2000 Buick Cielo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Buick Cielo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Buick Cielo | 1962 Ford Thunderbird | |
Make | Buick | Ford |
Model | Cielo | Thunderbird |
Year Released | 2000 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3800 cc | 6964 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 251 HP | 345 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1760 kg | 1875 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2880 mm |