2000 Buick Cielo vs. 1964 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2000 Buick Cielo is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Buick Cielo (251 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Buick Cielo should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 315 kg more than 2000 Buick Cielo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Buick Cielo | 1964 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Buick | Cadillac |
| Model | Cielo | 62 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3800 cc | 7028 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 251 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1760 kg | 2075 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 3300 mm |
