2000 Buick Cielo vs. 1964 Holden EK
To start off, 2000 Buick Cielo is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EK would be higher. At 3,800 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Buick Cielo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Buick Cielo (251 HP) has 186 more horse power than 1964 Holden EK. (65 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Buick Cielo should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Buick Cielo (387 Nm) has 227 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Holden EK. (160 Nm). This means 2000 Buick Cielo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Buick Cielo | 1964 Holden EK | |
| Make | Buick | Holden |
| Model | Cielo | EK |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3800 cc | 2260 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 251 HP | 65 HP |
| Torque | 387 Nm | 160 Nm |
