2000 Buick Cielo vs. 1964 Lotus Elan

To start off, 2000 Buick Cielo is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 3,800 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Buick Cielo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Buick Cielo (251 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 151 more horse power than 1964 Lotus Elan. (100 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Buick Cielo should accelerate faster than 1964 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Buick Cielo weights approximately 1170 kg more than 1964 Lotus Elan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1964 Lotus Elan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Lotus Elan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Buick Cielo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Buick Cielo (387 Nm) has 249 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Lotus Elan. (138 Nm). This means 2000 Buick Cielo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Lotus Elan. 2000 Buick Cielo has automatic transmission and 1964 Lotus Elan has manual transmission. 1964 Lotus Elan will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Buick Cielo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: