2000 Buick Cielo vs. 1965 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2000 Buick Cielo is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,733 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Buick Cielo (251 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1965 Ford Mustang. (208 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Buick Cielo should accelerate faster than 1965 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Buick Cielo weights approximately 595 kg more than 1965 Ford Mustang. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Buick Cielo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Buick Cielo | 1965 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Buick | Ford |
Model | Cielo | Mustang |
Year Released | 2000 | 1965 |
Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3800 cc | 4733 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 251 HP | 208 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1760 kg | 1165 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2750 mm |