2000 Buick Cielo vs. 1968 ZAZ 966

To start off, 2000 Buick Cielo is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 ZAZ 966. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 ZAZ 966 would be higher. At 3,800 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Buick Cielo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Buick Cielo (251 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 224 more horse power than 1968 ZAZ 966. (27 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Buick Cielo should accelerate faster than 1968 ZAZ 966. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Buick Cielo weights approximately 1020 kg more than 1968 ZAZ 966. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1968 ZAZ 966 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 ZAZ 966. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Buick Cielo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Buick Cielo (387 Nm) has 335 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 ZAZ 966. (52 Nm). This means 2000 Buick Cielo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 ZAZ 966.

Compare all specifications: