2000 Buick Cielo vs. 1981 Seat Ronda
To start off, 2000 Buick Cielo is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Seat Ronda. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Seat Ronda would be higher. At 3,800 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Buick Cielo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Buick Cielo (251 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 198 more horse power than 1981 Seat Ronda. (53 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Buick Cielo should accelerate faster than 1981 Seat Ronda. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Buick Cielo weights approximately 810 kg more than 1981 Seat Ronda. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Buick Cielo (387 Nm) has 289 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Seat Ronda. (98 Nm). This means 2000 Buick Cielo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Seat Ronda.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Buick Cielo | 1981 Seat Ronda | |
| Make | Buick | Seat |
| Model | Cielo | Ronda |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1981 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3800 cc | 1714 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 251 HP | 53 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 387 Nm | 98 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1760 kg | 950 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2460 mm |
