2000 Buick Cielo vs. 1982 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2000 Buick Cielo is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 3,800 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Buick Cielo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Buick Cielo (251 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 177 more horse power than 1982 Mitsubishi Colt. (74 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Buick Cielo should accelerate faster than 1982 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Buick Cielo weights approximately 855 kg more than 1982 Mitsubishi Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Buick Cielo (387 Nm) has 275 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mitsubishi Colt. (112 Nm). This means 2000 Buick Cielo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Buick Cielo | 1982 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Buick | Mitsubishi |
Model | Cielo | Colt |
Year Released | 2000 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3800 cc | 1597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 251 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 387 Nm | 112 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1760 kg | 905 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2390 mm |