2000 Buick Cielo vs. 1996 BMW 735
To start off, 2000 Buick Cielo is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 BMW 735. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 BMW 735 would be higher. At 3,800 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Buick Cielo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Buick Cielo (251 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1996 BMW 735. (232 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Buick Cielo should accelerate faster than 1996 BMW 735. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 BMW 735 weights approximately 60 kg more than 2000 Buick Cielo.
Because 1996 BMW 735 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 BMW 735. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Buick Cielo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Buick Cielo (387 Nm) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 BMW 735. (321 Nm). This means 2000 Buick Cielo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 BMW 735.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Buick Cielo | 1996 BMW 735 | |
Make | Buick | BMW |
Model | Cielo | 735 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1996 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3800 cc | 3498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 251 HP | 232 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 387 Nm | 321 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1760 kg | 1820 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2940 mm |