2000 Buick Cielo vs. 2011 Kia Forte
To start off, 2011 Kia Forte is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Buick Cielo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Buick Cielo would be higher. At 3,800 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Buick Cielo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Buick Cielo (251 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 2011 Kia Forte. (173 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Buick Cielo should accelerate faster than 2011 Kia Forte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Buick Cielo weights approximately 470 kg more than 2011 Kia Forte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Buick Cielo (387 Nm) has 159 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Kia Forte. (228 Nm). This means 2000 Buick Cielo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Kia Forte.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Buick Cielo | 2011 Kia Forte | |
Make | Buick | Kia |
Model | Cielo | Forte |
Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3800 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 251 HP | 173 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 387 Nm | 228 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1760 kg | 1290 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2649 mm |