2000 Buick LaCrosse vs. 1957 Maserati 250

To start off, 2000 Buick LaCrosse is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Maserati 250. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Maserati 250 would be higher. At 4,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Buick LaCrosse is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Buick LaCrosse (261 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1957 Maserati 250. (193 HP @ 7800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Buick LaCrosse should accelerate faster than 1957 Maserati 250. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Buick LaCrosse weights approximately 894 kg more than 1957 Maserati 250. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1957 Maserati 250 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1957 Maserati 250. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Buick LaCrosse, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Buick LaCrosse has automatic transmission and 1957 Maserati 250 has manual transmission. 1957 Maserati 250 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Buick LaCrosse will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: