2000 Buick LeSabre vs. 1966 Wartburg 312
To start off, 2000 Buick LeSabre is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Wartburg 312. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Wartburg 312 would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Buick LeSabre is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Buick LeSabre (205 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 161 more horse power than 1966 Wartburg 312. (44 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Buick LeSabre should accelerate faster than 1966 Wartburg 312. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Buick LeSabre weights approximately 722 kg more than 1966 Wartburg 312. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Buick LeSabre (312 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 231 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Wartburg 312. (81 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2000 Buick LeSabre will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Wartburg 312.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Buick LeSabre | 1966 Wartburg 312 | |
Make | Buick | Wartburg |
Model | LeSabre | 312 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 1000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 205 HP | 44 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 312 Nm | 81 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 97 mm | 70 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 78 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 6.6:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1682 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3080 mm | 2460 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 43 L |