2000 Buick Regal vs. 1962 Morgan 4
To start off, 2000 Buick Regal is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Morgan 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Morgan 4 would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Buick Regal is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Buick Regal (197 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 142 more horse power than 1962 Morgan 4. (55 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Buick Regal should accelerate faster than 1962 Morgan 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Buick Regal weights approximately 900 kg more than 1962 Morgan 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Morgan 4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Morgan 4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Buick Regal, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Buick Regal | 1962 Morgan 4 | |
| Make | Buick | Morgan |
| Model | Regal | 4 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3791 cc | 1340 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 55 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1560 kg | 660 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 3670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1430 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1300 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2450 mm |
