2000 Buick Regal vs. 2002 Toyota FCHV 5
To start off, 2002 Toyota FCHV 5 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Buick Regal. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Buick Regal would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Buick Regal is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Buick Regal (197 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2002 Toyota FCHV 5. (190 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Buick Regal should accelerate faster than 2002 Toyota FCHV 5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Toyota FCHV 5 weights approximately 141 kg more than 2000 Buick Regal.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Toyota FCHV 5 (353 Nm) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Buick Regal. (312 Nm). This means 2002 Toyota FCHV 5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Buick Regal.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Buick Regal | 2002 Toyota FCHV 5 | |
Make | Buick | Toyota |
Model | Regal | FCHV 5 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 2981 cc |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 312 Nm | 353 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1560 kg | 1701 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 2720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2860 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 60 L |