2000 Buick Regal vs. 2004 GMC Canyon
To start off, 2004 GMC Canyon is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Buick Regal. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Buick Regal would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Buick Regal is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 GMC Canyon (220 HP) has 23 more horse power than 2000 Buick Regal. (197 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 GMC Canyon should accelerate faster than 2000 Buick Regal. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 GMC Canyon weights approximately 395 kg more than 2000 Buick Regal. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Buick Regal (312 Nm) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 GMC Canyon. (305 Nm). This means 2000 Buick Regal will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 GMC Canyon.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Buick Regal | 2004 GMC Canyon | |
Make | Buick | GMC |
Model | Regal | Canyon |
Year Released | 2000 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 3458 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 220 HP |
Torque | 312 Nm | 305 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 97 mm | 93.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 102 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 10.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1560 kg | 1955 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 5270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 3210 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 72 L |