2000 Buick Rendezvous vs. 1983 Zastava 102
To start off, 2000 Buick Rendezvous is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 3,348 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Buick Rendezvous is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Buick Rendezvous (185 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 136 more horse power than 1983 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Buick Rendezvous should accelerate faster than 1983 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Buick Rendezvous weights approximately 1059 kg more than 1983 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Buick Rendezvous (285 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 190 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2000 Buick Rendezvous will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Buick Rendezvous | 1983 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Buick | Zastava |
| Model | Rendezvous | 102 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1983 |
| Engine Size | 3348 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 185 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 285 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1829 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2160 mm |
