2000 Cadillac Catera vs. 1965 Zastava 850 K
To start off, 2000 Cadillac Catera is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 2,962 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Cadillac Catera is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Cadillac Catera (200 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 165 more horse power than 1965 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Cadillac Catera should accelerate faster than 1965 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Cadillac Catera weights approximately 891 kg more than 1965 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Cadillac Catera | 1965 Zastava 850 K | |
Make | Cadillac | Zastava |
Model | Catera | 850 K |
Year Released | 2000 | 1965 |
Engine Size | 2962 cc | 846 cc |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 35 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1746 kg | 855 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 3740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2010 mm |