2000 Cadillac Catera vs. 1978 Mazda 616
To start off, 2000 Cadillac Catera is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 2,961 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Cadillac Catera is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Cadillac Catera (200 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 121 more horse power than 1978 Mazda 616. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Cadillac Catera should accelerate faster than 1978 Mazda 616. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Cadillac Catera weights approximately 793 kg more than 1978 Mazda 616. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Cadillac Catera (270 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 146 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Mazda 616. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2000 Cadillac Catera will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Cadillac Catera | 1978 Mazda 616 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
| Model | Catera | 616 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1978 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2961 cc | 1586 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 79 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 270 Nm | 124 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 78 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 85 mm | 83 mm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1705 kg | 912 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4890 mm | 4160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2480 mm |
