2000 Cadillac Catera vs. 1980 Mazda 929
To start off, 2000 Cadillac Catera is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 2,961 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Cadillac Catera is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Cadillac Catera (200 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 1980 Mazda 929. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Cadillac Catera should accelerate faster than 1980 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Cadillac Catera weights approximately 635 kg more than 1980 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Cadillac Catera (270 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 135 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Mazda 929. (135 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2000 Cadillac Catera will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Cadillac Catera | 1980 Mazda 929 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | Catera | 929 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2961 cc | 1769 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 270 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85 mm | 88 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1705 kg | 1070 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4890 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2520 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 55 L |