2000 Cadillac Catera vs. 1980 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2000 Cadillac Catera is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 2,962 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Cadillac Catera is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Cadillac Catera (200 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 1980 Toyota Celica. (118 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Cadillac Catera should accelerate faster than 1980 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Cadillac Catera weights approximately 564 kg more than 1980 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Cadillac Catera (260 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Toyota Celica. (215 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2000 Cadillac Catera will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Cadillac Catera | 1980 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
Model | Catera | Celica |
Year Released | 2000 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2962 cc | 2563 cc |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 260 Nm | 215 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1746 kg | 1182 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2640 mm |