2000 Cadillac Catera vs. 1982 Mazda 929
To start off, 2000 Cadillac Catera is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 2,962 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Cadillac Catera is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Cadillac Catera (200 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 1982 Mazda 929. (90 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Cadillac Catera should accelerate faster than 1982 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Cadillac Catera weights approximately 596 kg more than 1982 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Cadillac Catera (260 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mazda 929. (160 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2000 Cadillac Catera will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Cadillac Catera | 1982 Mazda 929 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | Catera | 929 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2962 cc | 1970 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 90 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 260 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1746 kg | 1150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2620 mm |