2000 Cadillac Catera vs. 1994 Mazda RX-7

To start off, 2000 Cadillac Catera is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 2,962 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Cadillac Catera is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Mazda RX-7 (238 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 2000 Cadillac Catera. (200 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Mazda RX-7 should accelerate faster than 2000 Cadillac Catera. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Cadillac Catera weights approximately 446 kg more than 1994 Mazda RX-7.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Mazda RX-7 (296 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Cadillac Catera. (260 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1994 Mazda RX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Cadillac Catera.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Cadillac Catera 1994 Mazda RX-7
Make Cadillac Mazda
Model Catera RX-7
Year Released 2000 1994
Body Type Sedan Convertible
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2962 cc 2615 cc
Engine Type V dual-disk rotary
Horse Power 200 HP 238 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 6500 RPM
Torque 260 Nm 296 Nm
Torque RPM 3600 RPM 5000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1746 kg 1300 kg
Vehicle Length 4930 mm 4320 mm
Vehicle Width 1790 mm 1700 mm
Vehicle Height 1440 mm 1240 mm
Wheelbase Size 2750 mm 2440 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 68 L 77 L