2000 Cadillac Catera vs. 1994 Mercedes-Benz MCC

To start off, 2000 Cadillac Catera is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mercedes-Benz MCC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mercedes-Benz MCC would be higher. Both 2000 Cadillac Catera and 1994 Mercedes-Benz MCC are equipped with a 2,962 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Cadillac Catera (200 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1994 Mercedes-Benz MCC. (141 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Cadillac Catera should accelerate faster than 1994 Mercedes-Benz MCC. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Mercedes-Benz MCC weights approximately 304 kg more than 2000 Cadillac Catera.

Because 2000 Cadillac Catera is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Cadillac Catera. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Mercedes-Benz MCC, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications: