2000 Cadillac Catera vs. 2004 GMC Savana
To start off, 2004 GMC Savana is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Cadillac Catera. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Cadillac Catera would be higher. At 5,326 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 GMC Savana is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 GMC Savana (295 HP) has 95 more horse power than 2000 Cadillac Catera. (200 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 GMC Savana should accelerate faster than 2000 Cadillac Catera. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 GMC Savana weights approximately 607 kg more than 2000 Cadillac Catera. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 GMC Savana (448 Nm) has 188 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Cadillac Catera. (260 Nm). This means 2004 GMC Savana will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Cadillac Catera.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Cadillac Catera | 2004 GMC Savana | |
Make | Cadillac | GMC |
Model | Catera | Savana |
Year Released | 2000 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2962 cc | 5326 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 295 HP |
Torque | 260 Nm | 448 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85 mm | 92 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1746 kg | 2353 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 5700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 2080 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 3440 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.9 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 117 L |