2000 Cadillac Catera vs. 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer

To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Cadillac Catera. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Cadillac Catera would be higher. At 2,961 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Cadillac Catera is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Cadillac Catera (200 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer. (164 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Cadillac Catera should accelerate faster than 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Cadillac Catera weights approximately 335 kg more than 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2000 Cadillac Catera is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Cadillac Catera. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Cadillac Catera (270 Nm) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer. (210 Nm). This means 2000 Cadillac Catera will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Cadillac Catera 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer
Make Cadillac Mitsubishi
Model Catera Lancer
Year Released 2000 2004
Body Type Sedan Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2961 cc 2376 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 200 HP 164 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 270 Nm 210 Nm
Engine Bore Size 86 mm 87 mm
Engine Stroke Size 85 mm 100 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.0:1 9.5:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1705 kg 1370 kg
Vehicle Length 4890 mm 4610 mm
Vehicle Width 1790 mm 1700 mm
Vehicle Height 1440 mm 1410 mm
Wheelbase Size 2740 mm 2610 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 60 L 50 L