2000 Cadillac Catera vs. 2005 Westfield XTR 2
To start off, 2005 Westfield XTR 2 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Cadillac Catera. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Cadillac Catera would be higher. At 2,961 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Cadillac Catera is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Cadillac Catera (200 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 2005 Westfield XTR 2. (173 HP @ 9800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Cadillac Catera should accelerate faster than 2005 Westfield XTR 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Cadillac Catera weights approximately 1265 kg more than 2005 Westfield XTR 2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Cadillac Catera | 2005 Westfield XTR 2 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Westfield |
| Model | Catera | XTR 2 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2005 |
| Engine Size | 2961 cc | 1297 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 173 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 9800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1705 kg | 440 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4890 mm | 3690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2320 mm |
