2000 Cadillac Catera vs. 2006 Holden Commodore

To start off, 2006 Holden Commodore is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Cadillac Catera. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Cadillac Catera would be higher. At 2,961 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Cadillac Catera is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Holden Commodore (240 HP) has 40 more horse power than 2000 Cadillac Catera. (200 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 2000 Cadillac Catera.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Cadillac Catera (270 Nm) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Holden Commodore. (240 Nm). This means 2000 Cadillac Catera will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Holden Commodore. 2000 Cadillac Catera has automatic transmission and 2006 Holden Commodore has manual transmission. 2006 Holden Commodore will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Cadillac Catera will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: