2000 Cadillac Catera vs. 2009 Mercury Sable

To start off, 2009 Mercury Sable is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Cadillac Catera. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Cadillac Catera would be higher. At 3,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mercury Sable (263 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 2000 Cadillac Catera. (200 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mercury Sable should accelerate faster than 2000 Cadillac Catera. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mercury Sable weights approximately 221 kg more than 2000 Cadillac Catera. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2000 Cadillac Catera is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Cadillac Catera. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mercury Sable, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mercury Sable (338 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Cadillac Catera. (270 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2009 Mercury Sable will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Cadillac Catera.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Cadillac Catera 2009 Mercury Sable
Make Cadillac Mercury
Model Catera Sable
Year Released 2000 2009
Body Type Sedan Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2961 cc 3496 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 200 HP 263 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 6250 RPM
Torque 270 Nm 338 Nm
Torque RPM 3400 RPM 4500 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 10.0:1 10.3:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1705 kg 1926 kg
Vehicle Length 4890 mm 5140 mm
Vehicle Width 1790 mm 1900 mm
Vehicle Height 1440 mm 1570 mm
Wheelbase Size 2740 mm 2870 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 60 L 78 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]