2000 Cadillac Eldorado vs. 1977 Volvo 164

To start off, 2000 Cadillac Eldorado is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Volvo 164. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Volvo 164 would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Cadillac Eldorado (290 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 152 more horse power than 1977 Volvo 164. (138 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Cadillac Eldorado should accelerate faster than 1977 Volvo 164.

Because 1977 Volvo 164 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Volvo 164. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Cadillac Eldorado, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Cadillac Eldorado (400 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 196 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Volvo 164. (204 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2000 Cadillac Eldorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Volvo 164.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Cadillac Eldorado 1977 Volvo 164
Make Cadillac Volvo
Model Eldorado 164
Year Released 2000 1977
Body Type Coupe Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4565 cc 2664 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 290 HP 138 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 400 Nm 204 Nm
Torque RPM 4400 RPM 3000 RPM
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 5100 mm 5610 mm
Vehicle Width 1920 mm 1720 mm
Vehicle Height 1370 mm 1440 mm
Wheelbase Size 2750 mm 3350 mm