2000 Cadillac Eldorado vs. 1982 Audi 4000
To start off, 2000 Cadillac Eldorado is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Audi 4000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Audi 4000 would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Cadillac Eldorado (290 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 190 more horse power than 1982 Audi 4000. (100 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Cadillac Eldorado should accelerate faster than 1982 Audi 4000.
Because 1982 Audi 4000 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Cadillac Eldorado. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Audi 4000 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Cadillac Eldorado (400 Nm) has 263 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Audi 4000. (137 Nm). This means 2000 Cadillac Eldorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Audi 4000.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Cadillac Eldorado | 1982 Audi 4000 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Audi |
| Model | Eldorado | 4000 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4565 cc | 2144 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 290 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Torque | 400 Nm | 137 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 79.2 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 86.4 mm |
| Top Speed | 241 km/hour | 168 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4490 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2550 mm |
