2000 Cadillac Imaj vs. 1989 ZIL 4104
To start off, 2000 Cadillac Imaj is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 ZIL 4104. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 ZIL 4104 would be higher. At 7,690 cc (8 cylinders), 1989 ZIL 4104 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Cadillac Imaj (420 HP) has 108 more horse power than 1989 ZIL 4104. (312 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Cadillac Imaj should accelerate faster than 1989 ZIL 4104.
Because 2000 Cadillac Imaj is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1989 ZIL 4104. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Cadillac Imaj will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 ZIL 4104 (607 Nm) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Cadillac Imaj. (553 Nm). This means 1989 ZIL 4104 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Cadillac Imaj.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Cadillac Imaj | 1989 ZIL 4104 | |
| Make | Cadillac | ZIL |
| Model | Imaj | 4104 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1989 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4228 cc | 7690 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 420 HP | 312 HP |
| Torque | 553 Nm | 607 Nm |
| Top Speed | 244 km/hour | 199 km/hour |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 6350 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 2100 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 3890 mm |
