2000 Cadillac Seville vs. 1951 Talbot Baby
To start off, 2000 Cadillac Seville is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Talbot Baby. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Talbot Baby would be higher. At 4,572 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Cadillac Seville is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Cadillac Seville (290 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 182 more horse power than 1951 Talbot Baby. (108 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Cadillac Seville should accelerate faster than 1951 Talbot Baby. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Cadillac Seville weights approximately 177 kg more than 1951 Talbot Baby. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1951 Talbot Baby is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Talbot Baby. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Cadillac Seville, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Cadillac Seville | 1951 Talbot Baby | |
| Make | Cadillac | Talbot |
| Model | Seville | Baby |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1951 |
| Engine Size | 4572 cc | 2690 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 290 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1827 kg | 1650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 5060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 3130 mm |
