2000 Cadillac Seville vs. 1952 Saab 92
To start off, 2000 Cadillac Seville is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Saab 92. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Saab 92 would be higher. At 4,572 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Cadillac Seville is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Cadillac Seville (301 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 277 more horse power than 1952 Saab 92. (24 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Cadillac Seville should accelerate faster than 1952 Saab 92. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Cadillac Seville weights approximately 999 kg more than 1952 Saab 92. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Cadillac Seville | 1952 Saab 92 | |
Make | Cadillac | Saab |
Model | Seville | 92 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1952 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4572 cc | 764 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 301 HP | 24 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1804 kg | 805 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 3960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2480 mm |