2000 Cadillac Seville vs. 1960 DKW Munga
To start off, 2000 Cadillac Seville is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 DKW Munga would be higher. At 4,572 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Cadillac Seville is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Cadillac Seville (290 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 247 more horse power than 1960 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Cadillac Seville should accelerate faster than 1960 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Cadillac Seville weights approximately 717 kg more than 1960 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Cadillac Seville. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1960 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Cadillac Seville | 1960 DKW Munga | |
Make | Cadillac | DKW |
Model | Seville | Munga |
Year Released | 2000 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4572 cc | 980 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 290 HP | 43 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 7.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1827 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 3450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 31 L |