2000 Cadillac Seville vs. 1961 Morgan 4
To start off, 2000 Cadillac Seville is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Morgan 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Morgan 4 would be higher. At 4,572 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Cadillac Seville is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Cadillac Seville (290 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 235 more horse power than 1961 Morgan 4. (55 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Cadillac Seville should accelerate faster than 1961 Morgan 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Cadillac Seville weights approximately 1167 kg more than 1961 Morgan 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1961 Morgan 4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Morgan 4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Cadillac Seville, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Cadillac Seville | 1961 Morgan 4 | |
Make | Cadillac | Morgan |
Model | Seville | 4 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1961 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4572 cc | 1339 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 290 HP | 55 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1827 kg | 660 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2450 mm |