2000 Cadillac Seville vs. 1963 DKW Munga
To start off, 2000 Cadillac Seville is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 4,563 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Cadillac Seville is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Cadillac Seville (271 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 228 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Cadillac Seville should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Cadillac Seville weights approximately 638 kg more than 1963 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Cadillac Seville. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Cadillac Seville | 1963 DKW Munga | |
Make | Cadillac | DKW |
Model | Seville | Munga |
Year Released | 2000 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4563 cc | 980 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 271 HP | 43 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 76.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 74 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1748 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 3450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 31 L |