2000 Cadillac Seville vs. 1963 NSU 1000 C

To start off, 2000 Cadillac Seville is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 NSU 1000 C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 NSU 1000 C would be higher. At 4,572 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Cadillac Seville is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Cadillac Seville (290 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 251 more horse power than 1963 NSU 1000 C. (39 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Cadillac Seville should accelerate faster than 1963 NSU 1000 C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Cadillac Seville weights approximately 1187 kg more than 1963 NSU 1000 C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1963 NSU 1000 C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 NSU 1000 C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Cadillac Seville, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Cadillac Seville (400 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 331 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 NSU 1000 C. (69 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2000 Cadillac Seville will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 NSU 1000 C. 2000 Cadillac Seville has automatic transmission and 1963 NSU 1000 C has manual transmission. 1963 NSU 1000 C will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Cadillac Seville will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Cadillac Seville 1963 NSU 1000 C
Make Cadillac NSU
Model Seville 1000 C
Year Released 2000 1963
Engine Position Front Rear
Engine Size 4572 cc 996 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 290 HP 39 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 400 Nm 69 Nm
Torque RPM 4400 RPM 3000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 93 mm 69 mm
Engine Stroke Size 84 mm 66.6 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.0:1 7.5:1
Top Speed 241 km/hour 130 km/hour
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1827 kg 640 kg
Vehicle Length 5000 mm 3790 mm
Vehicle Width 1910 mm 1490 mm
Vehicle Height 1410 mm 1370 mm
Wheelbase Size 2890 mm 2260 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 70 L 44 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]